Gal Shalev sat down with Dr. Jessica Rose to speak about her censored peer-reviewed Vaers paper that she wrote with Peter Mcculough.
Intense and worrying information
“Jessica Rose, PhD just had her paper on VAERS analysis of myocarditis rejected
after two rounds of review at ‘Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine,” philanthropist Steve Kirsch,
founder of COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF), noted. “NO REASON GIVEN.
This is scientific misconduct at its finest by the peer reviewers (not the Journal). Jessica is first-rate.”
“You cannot get any paper published that is anti-vaccine nowadays,” he added.
“Academics will ONLY believe what is peer reviewed.
So the vaccines are safe because there are no papers saying it isn’t, even though the data shows it isn’t.
BUT NOBODY LOOKS AT THE DATA anymore.”
Jessica Rose, PhD just had her paper on VAERS analysis of myocarditis rejected after two rounds of review at "Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine." NO REASON GIVEN. This is scientific misconduct at its finest by the peer reviewers (not the Journal). Jessica is first-rate. pic.twitter.com/gXUNw5Mf6Z
— Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) September 16, 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment